Given the news that 40% of American households are now
headed by a female breadwinner, the ever-reliable Fox News put together a panel
of (male) pundits to deplore the destruction of society as we know it. As
usual, women are implicitly held to blame for this state of the nation.
Among the gems averred by the Fox panel was the sage
commentary that in nature, males tend to be dominant. Really? Try telling that
to a pride of hard-working lionesses as they set out on a hunt, leaving the
male to relax and groom his mane, which he’ll need should another male approach
and attempt a territorial usurpation. On that point, I won’t argue, Fox. Males
are definitely the “kings” of territorial warfare.
In many animal species, in fact, the males’ only
contribution to the family is, well, sperm. The mothers are left to do WHATEVER
it takes to raise the young, sacrificing themselves to the good of perpetuity. The
news that 40% of households claim females as the predominant breadwinners tells
us one thing – that the vast majority of mothers will do whatever it takes to
feed, clothe, and raise their children. The aging Women’s “Liberation” movement
merely makes this somewhat possible, though still difficult.
A working mother myself, I also count as friends and
colleagues a large number of working mothers. None of us pretend that we prefer
time on the job to time with our children. All of us acknowledge that it is –
at least partially – our responsibility to care for the nascent lives we’ve
brought into the world.
In some cases,
the fathers of these children also accept partial responsibility. In other
cases, sadly, they disavow this obligation, or hold that it is only the case if
the planets align in such a way that they can easily perform their duty.
Mothers rarely wait for such a magical alignment of the planets. Their primary
concern is food and a table to put it on. So, Fox panel, bully to you if your
families are perfect models of an “appropriate” social order. You’ll pardon the
rest of us if we get on with the business of living.